Period March - May 2008

MEETING PLACE
Chapter meetings are held at St. Joseph's Convent, 16 York Street, South Perth. Meetings are held each 3rd. Sunday, commencing at 2.00pm sharp.
March - Chapter meeting to be held on Sunday, 16 March. Discussion on RB 68 & the Gospel of the day - Mt. 26:14 - 27:66.
April - Chapter meeting to be held on Sunday, 20 April. Discussion on RB 69 & the Gospel of the day - Jn. 14:1 - 12.
May - There will be no Chapter meeting during the month of May, as our annual retreat held at New Norcia, will take its place.


PRAYER LIST
Please remember all our sick oblates - in particular Pat Cockett & Michael Kent.
Prayers requested for Des Hoad and Levi.
Also and always, continue to pray for our parent community in New Norcia.
Would you please remember all our deceased oblates.
Please pray for the repose of the soul of Dom Benedict who died on 5 January, age 76. Several oblates journeyed to New Norcia for the funeral on Friday 11 January. Dom Benedict was buried in the New Norcia cemetery, next to his mother who died at New Norcia, after working there, several decades ago.


ITEMS OF INTEREST
Please remember that our annual retreat at New Norcia will be held over the Trinity Sunday weekend Friday - Monday - 16, 17,18 & 19 May 2008. Ensure your place there by booking through our Secretary, Adrienne Byrne on tel. 9388 3026. Also please advise her immediately should you have to cancel.
As is usual at our Christmas social functions, we had a good roll-up, with about eighteen oblates in December. Our grateful thanks to oblate Doris Walton, who was the hostess on this occasion and went out of her way to make the day a success.
Our first regular Chapter meeting of the year was held on 17 February, together with our Annual General Meeting, presided over by
Fr. Anthony. Those elected are as follows:
President - Tony Smurthwaite
Secretary - Adrienne Byrne
Treasurer - Michael McGovern
Assistant Secretary - Doris Walton
Spiritual Director -
Fr. Anthony Lovis OSB
Committee Members - Eleanor Sgherza, Mike Schilling & Don Morris.
Congratulations to Tony Smurthwaite who has once again taken up the reins of President after a long period of time. A vote of thanks was passed at the meeting for outgoing President, Brian Low. At this time, we thank all our officers and Committee members for their support over the past year, particularly those who have re-enlisted for another term. Continuing thanks to
Fr. Anthony for his unfailing dedication in travelling each month from New Norcia, his homilies, spiritual oversight of our group and annual retreat presentation.

FATHER ANTHONY - 25 YEARS A PRIEST
Taken with thanks from an article in The Chimes Newsletter.
Playing schoolboy football at New Norcia isn't what one might normally think would lead a person to join the monastery, but for Fr Anthony Lovis, who on 13 December celebrated his 25th anniversary of ordination to priesthood, it was a factor.
After having already embarked on religious life with the Franciscans, 'I discovered I wanted a more contemplative lifestyle,' Fr Anthony said, 'and New Norcia was the only monastery I knew, as I'd played football here as a schoolboy.'
Born in
Perth in 1942, Fr Anthony was 31-years-old and working as a costing clerk for 'The International Harvester Company' in Perth, when he joined the Franciscans. 'I was attracted to them because I had heard a lot about my namesake, St Anthony, a Franciscan friar,' Fr Anthony said.
But it was during his 12-months' postulancy (a period of formation before novitiate) with the Franciscans in
Melbourne, that Fr Anthony realised he wanted a more contemplative lifestyle. 'Besides playing football at New Norcia, I had come here for a couple of days in my mid-20s to get a feel for the lifestyle,' Fr Anthony said, describing his decision to enter the monastery here in 1976.
But becoming a monk does not automatically mean becoming a priest also - Benedictine monks traditionally only have sufficient priests for the community's needs. 'When you arrived at that front gate, you were asked if you came to be a monk. If you said you came to be a priest, you'd be told there was a seminary down the road in
Perth and to go join it,' Fr Anthony said. 'The contemplative lifestyle was my priority.'
However, after his first couple of years of monastic formation, Fr Anthony was asked by the community to become a priest. 'With the Franciscans I had done some introductory studies and I thought then that I could handle the studies for priesthood, but when the monks asked me, I did wonder whether I wanted that challenge at my age.'
After further studies at New Norcia and three years at Yarra Theological Union in
Melbourne, Fr Anthony was ordained in 1982 by Archbishop Launcelot Goody at the New Norcia church.
Fr Anthony remembers that for the first couple of years he often used to get stage fright during the liturgy. He was later appointed parish priest of New Norcia, a position he held for fifteen years. 'That threw up its own challenges,' Fr Anthony said, 'trying to bond three widely spread out centres with New Norcia, into a homogenous parish.'
Reflecting on his years of priesthood, Fr Anthony wondered: 'Where has the time gone? Twenty-five years has passed in a flash.'


THE PRESENCE OF GOD THROUGH BENEDICTINE SPIRITUALITY
by Father Adrian Burke, OSB - continued from the last newsletter
Work

The traditional motto of the Order of
St. Benedict is Ora et Labora, pray and work. Prayer is only one side of the ladder of our lives. The other side is the work that we do in order to contribute to the well-being of our community and of the world in which we live.
Work is how we human beings act in a generative, creative manner and thus fulfil our human inclination, rooted in our likeness to God, to be creative beings. We take raw materials-such as wood, earth, clay, metal, thoughts, concepts, attitudes, even love - and reshape them in order to make something that already exists, better, more fruitful and in this way give glory to God. In doing our work, we enter into the creative power of God and act with God in creating the world anew.
Work, because it is an inherent part of being fully human, has integrity of its own. It gets its integrity from the human persons who do it. Yet work is not an end in itself. The purpose of work is to build a better world, build the Reign of God and thereby, give God the glory. St. Irenaeus of
Lyon once said, 'The glory of God is the human being fully alive.' A fully alive human person, is one who engages in meaningful, fruitful and life-giving work for the good of the community.
All of this is not to say that prayer is work, or my work is my prayer. To believe so is a cop-out and does damage to the balance in Christian life that requires both contemplative retreat and active working in order to live fully according to the Gospel imperatives. We retreat with God to be refreshed and renewed in order to bring fresh perspectives and new energies and insights to our work in the world. Our work engages us in the world where we can make a difference, bear the light and help to build the Kingdom. We then go back to retreat with God in prayer and the cycle continues. For the monk, this is a daily rhythm.
Authority and Community

The basic building blocks of any monastery are a rule of life. For us, it is the Rule of St. Benedict, lived under the authority of an abbot and within the confines of a commitment to life in community.
The Rule establishes an outline of norms for daily living. Written in the sixth century in central
Italy, not everything you find in the Rule pertains to monastic life in the twentieth century. Codes about sleeping arrangements, food, articles of possession, as well as the arrangement of the psalms at the Liturgy of the Hours, all differ widely with each monastery. The abbot, because he takes the place of Christ in the monastery, has the authority to adapt the Rule to the circumstances of time and place for that particular monastery. This flexibility, along with its simplicity, has allowed the Rule to survive 1500 years as a way of living out the Gospel commandment to love God and neighbour.
To live in community is to imitate in life the great community we call the Trinity, our God. To seek God by living for others is the key to this way of life. Everything we do as monks is to be done for the sake of the whole, for the good of the community. Our work, our prayer and even our recreation is done for the sake of the whole, of which each of us is a unique part. My mental, emotional, physical and spiritual health all strengthen my community by allowing me to contribute to the life of the community through prayer, play, work and service.
Human life is relational. We are in relationships with family, friends, the environment and all of creation. Through each and all of these relationships, we encounter God and deepen our relationship with Him. Our relationship with God is the principal relationship that directs and guides all of our other relationships. When we sin, our selfishness breaks down our connectedness with God. Through selfishness, we undermine justice, which is about right relationships, relationships that respect the integrity of self and others. Justice is rooted in a fundamental understanding of ourselves as made in the image and likeness of God, a likeness renewed by Christ and made greater than before by His self-sacrifice on the cross.
The Cross is our supreme model of behaviour in the community of the monastery, as it is in the wider community of faith within the Church at large. Jesus has given us a way to live that is new and requires a new way of perceiving the world. No longer are we to hold to our own ways of doing things, or to hold on to our ideas and conceptions of reality as if we had all the answers. We are to live in a manner that is open to conversion at every moment, open to another's will, ultimately to God's Will, laying aside our own proclivities and ideas about how things ought to go. This is the vow of conversatio, conversion of manners, that we monks take upon entering this way of life. By placing ourselves under the authority of the abbot, we embrace a freedom that is not of this world.
This is not easy to do. It takes true humility to lay aside our ego's will and begin to do things according to the will of the abbot and the community in which we live. This does not mean that I am no longer to voice my opinion. To be silent when I have something helpful to say would be selfish indeed. Rather, it means that I am to remain in the posture of humility, listening carefully to what others have to say, that they might be respectful of what I have to say.
As you can see, there is nothing particularly extraordinary about our way of living the Gospel way of life. All of these principles can readily be translated into life lived in the secular world. In fact, they must be. This Gospel way of life is the light which enlightens the world and we are to be the source of that light, agents of the transforming power of the Holy Spirit. We monks strive to live this way as a witness to the world of what God is calling all people to - life lived for others, the life for the glory of God.
May your life continue to be a living witness to the saving power of Jesus Christ and may God bestow upon you, peace and goodness.

HOPE
By Benet Connor OSB, taken from the St. John's Abbey oblate newsletter.
It wasn't too long ago that a young man asked me a question which I am sure could have been asked by many of us unconsciously - 'Father,' he asked, 'what is hope? I mean what does it mean to have hope? We get up every day, go to breakfast the same way, go to school or work, have a period of recreation or study, eat dinner, study or watch television, maybe go to a movie and then retire to bed, only to rise again the next day to follow a similar schedule. What is there to hope? What is the use of it all?'
Do not bury this question as a passing problem and pretend it does not exist. It will only pop up again later, perhaps in a more serious form. What indeed is the sense of hope? Any routine can become distressing and when things go badly within that routine, everything about you can distress you. Relationships seem to go sour, work grows dull and tedious, the days become long and without meaning. Our whole life can take on a dark gloomy existence and we might well ask - 'Father, what is hope?'
Let us not exclude ourselves when seeking fault. Let us not look to our supervisor at work or teacher at school or at our seeming too-heavy schedule. Let us look where the real cause is-let us look at ourselves. Somewhere along the way we have lost the close contact with the 'someone else' in our lives. I do not here refer to one special and particular 'someone else,' but simply 'someone else.' When we find ourselves in this dark attitude of gloom it is usually the dark attitude of egoism. In our egoism we can close out everyone - and this includes God. When this happens, the very natural result must be the question - 'What is hope?'
Hope is a paradox. We seek happiness and we find sorrow. We seek peace and we find strife. We look for joy and find only discouragement. The paradox is, that there seems to be no joy without discouragement, no peace without strife and no happiness without sorrow. That which is the transforming power of these paradoxes is hope.
Frequent are the experiences in our lives of how much happiness is found largely through the anticipation of possessing the thing we seek. We hope for what is to come and in that very hope, that anticipation, is found the first traces of the fruit, not yet attained.
Hope is the fundamental attitude a Christian soul has toward God and toward the guiding hand of God in his life. With this attitude, the discouragement, the strife, the sorrow, can be borne because this attitude looks toward our destiny, our happiness to come which is fully attainable only with God. If God were to allow us to measure out for ourselves the 'proper amount' of discouragement and sadness, I think we would deal ourselves a pretty meagre share and as a result we would know only the superficialities of peace and happiness. For deep happiness can be uncovered by living through deep sadness.
In the anticipation of this happiness, we find also the light and strength to perform the daily tasks. This hope enables us to allow the daily schedule to provide a maximum of effort and production for us and refuses to allow the regular pattern of work to become a straitjacket to our freedom.
This brings us back to the 'someone else' in our lives. With this hope, this basic attitude, we can discover a joy - not a giddy vivaciousness, often not a mark of happiness anyway - but a real deep-seated joy, rooted in interest and confidence in someone else. We place someone else's interests before our own and when these interests are God's, we are saying in effect, 'Your will and not mine be done.' These were also Christ's own words to his Father. What better model can we have?
But how did Christ, our model, work this out practically each day in His own life? For surely He found routine in His life, much as the young man who asked the original question about hope found in his and much as you and I find in our own lives. Jesus must have become deeply interested in the work He performed, the simple, common tasks of a carpenter and when the work became monotonous, then His interest must have been in the people around Him.
For when one permits the daily schedule to become something 'apart from himself,' he can only become bored and disinterested and his routine can only become a rut. His hope can only become hopelessness and he will seek his consolation elsewhere, in illicit pleasures which promise falsely to lift one above the daily affairs. Hope is in others. Hope is in God. Hope is in His providence which takes us through, not around, the joys and sorrows alike which are the parts which make up the total love story of our human history.

THE DESERT FATHERS
Commencing some articles on and surrounding the era of the Desert Fathers, taken from 'Desert Christians', by William Harmless SJ.
In the fourth century, the deserts of
Egypt became the nerve centre of a radical new movement, what we now call monasticism. Groups of Christians - from illiterate peasants to learned intellectuals - moved out to the wastelands beyond the Nile Valley and in the famous words of St. Athanasius, 'made the desert a city'. In so doing, they captured the imagination of the ancient world. They forged techniques of prayer and asceticism, of discipleship and spiritual direction, that have remained central to Christianity ever since. Seeking to map the soul's long journey to God and plot out the subtle vagaries of the human heart, they created and inspired texts that became classics of Western spirituality. These desert Christians were also brilliant storytellers, some of Christianity's finest.
Alexandria - on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, was the gateway to Egypt, being one of the largest, most prosperous and sophisticated cities of the Roman Empire having some 200,000 plus inhabitants. It stands at the western edge of the Nile Delta. The Nile River itself, is a long narrow lifeline in a virtually rainless country. Abba Macarius, an early monastic leader, once happened upon two hermits living in the remote regions of the desert. Their first question to him was deeply Egyptian - 'Is the water rising in due time? Is the world enjoying prosperity?' The rising water was of course, the yearly flooding of the Nile and Egypt's prosperity - indeed its very life - depended upon its 'rising in due time'. The river's yearly flood, which used to begin in June and peak in September, brought not only water, but also rich silt down from the highlands of Ethiopia and transformed the Nile Valley into an immensely rich agricultural basin. The Nile flows from south to north. This means that Upper Egypt is south and Lower Egypt is north. The Nile wanders down some 600 miles from the southern frontier at ancient Syene (modern day Aswan), then splits into three large branches just south of the ancient city of Babylon (present day Cairo). There it forms the vast flood plain known as the Delta, triangular in shape, 100 miles south to north and 150 miles at its widest place. While some desert fathers were Alexandrians and others foreigners, most came from villages along the river. This world had, of course, been one of the cradles of human civilisation and boasted a rich and proud 3000 year old history and culture. The prosperity of that world revolved around the regular rise and fall of the Nile, Egypt being known at that time, as the 'granary of Rome'.
Egyptian Christianity - Christians in
Egypt have traditionally claimed St. Mark as the founder of their church. Eusebius of Caesarea, the fourth century church historian, says Mark was 'the first to be sent to preach in Egypt, the gospel which he had also put in writing and also the first to establish churches in Alexandria itself.' However, generally speaking, there is little known about Egyptian Christianity before the year 200AD.
Origen and the Alexandrian Theological Tradition -
Alexandria had long been one of the great intellectual centres of the Roman world, but in the third century, it emerged as the intellectual centre of Christianity. No one embodied its scholarly rigor more than Origen (c.185-254), one of the great theologians in Christian history. Although his career immediately predates the era of the Desert Fathers, his thought profoundly affected both desert monks and desert literature.
Origen was born into a Christian family in
Alexandria. His father died a martyr in the persecution of 201, leaving the family bankrupt. He commenced teaching Greek literature and fearlessly defied the persecutions of 206-211, daring to teach catechumens, after church authorities had fled the city.
He travelled widely, to
Rome, Greece, Syria and Arabia, earning an international reputation for his wisdom and learning. In the 230's he clashed with the bishop of Alexandria, Demetrious and ended up settling in Caesarea in Palestine. In 250, during the persecution of Decius, he was arrested and severely tortured. He died a few years later from his wounds.
Origen was by training and temperament, a scholar. He brought formidable skills to the study of the Bible. He was one of the few early church, gentile Christians to have some mastery of Hebrew. He put together a remarkable six column edition of the Old Testament, which enabled him to compare and contrast different Greek translations, with the original Hebrew. He was prolific and dictated commentaries on virtually every book of the Bible, only a fraction of which still survive.
He was also a pioneer of systematic theology and authored a remarkable treatise - On First Principles. Throughout his career and especially in this book, he proposed bold hypotheses. Some of his most original would earn him fierce opposition during his life and damage his long term reputation. For example, he recognised that the creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2, do not match. So he read these not as two creation accounts (as most scholars do) but as two separate creations. He proposed other controversial hypotheses on the nature of the Godhead, on the soul of Christ and on the resurrection.
Origen powerfully influenced leading church fathers, such as Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nazianzus and Ambrose. He certainly influenced Athanasius, whose Life of Antony is such an important part of Desert Father history. He may have influenced
Antony himself, if the Letters ascribed to him are authentic. Intellectual circles in the desert, led by Evagrius Ponticus and the Tall Brothers (so-called because of their unusual height), drew heavily on Origen's writings. Three centuries after his death, Origen was condemned as a heretic by the Council of Constantinople II in 553. The seventeenth century biblical scholar, Richard Simon, once remarked - 'Most of the fathers who lived after Origen scarcely did anything but copy his commentaries and treatises on Scripture……..even those most opposed to his sentiments could not help from reading them and profiting from them.'
The Origenist Controversy. It was 150 years after his death that the great Origenist Controversy exploded. It has been described as one of the great crises in Egyptian monasticism. It resulted in the purge and exile of leading intellectuals from the major centres of Nitria, Scetis and Kellia. Ancient documents on the controversy are abundant, but they are deeply biased and come from either participants or partisans. At certain junctures, it is hard to know what happened or whom to believe and especially, to sort out the real issues and motives behind what happened.
Theophilus, the Bishop of Alexandria from 385-412, following the usual custom, sent out his annual festal letter and included in it a reflection on a key issue touching the life and faith of the Egyptian church. In it he attacked the heresy of 'Anthropomorphism' (that is, conceiving or visualising God in crudely human or materialist terms). He insisted, as had Origen, that God had no human form and that all biblical mention of God's face, hands, feet and so on, must be read allegorically. The true God being incorporeal, beyond body or matter. This letter was delivered to all the churches and monasteries in
Egypt. It caused extreme consternation and disruption among the monastic communities, with many refusing to promulgate it. One of the old monks, Serapion, who for so many years had pictured God in his mind whenever he prayed, burst into tears and threw himself on the ground, sobbing - 'they have taken my God from me and I have no one to lay hold of , nor do I know whom I should adore or address'.
Monks outraged by the letter marched to
Alexandria and began violent demonstrations. They confronted Theophilus and his life being threatened, he did a complete turn around and agreed to commence a general attack on the works of Origen. This became a wide ranging campaign, even leading a violent attack on the monasteries of lower Egypt. Things reached a climax in 400, when he enlisted support from the prefect and sent a military detachment to arrest the Origenists. The leaders, the Tall Brothers, who were renowned for their learning and holiness and had been close associates of Theophilus in the past, together with some 300 monks, fled to Palestine initially, while their cells were ransacked and burned. Some continued on to Constantinople, where they appealed to the bishop, St. John Chrysostom. Theophilus, outraged, attacked John too and had him formally deposed. This marked the beginning and end of John's tenure and led ultimately to his death in exile.
In the next issue we will take a look at some of the monastic settlements in
Egypt.

MERRIE OLDE ENGLAND
By James Bemis, abridged from an article in the LatinMassMagazine Nov. 2007. Can we, living in such a broken world, imagine there was once a time and place where there was no poverty, where work and food were plentiful for every family, where widows, orphans and strangers were cared for? Could there have been a land known for its generosity, revelry and gaiety, where laughter echoed through the hills on feast days and the weeping of the poor and oppressed were heard not? Have ever a people loved Our Lord so deeply that they wholeheartedly founded their society, both civil and ecclesiastical, on His teachings?
Yes, there has been.
England from roughly 1350 to 1536 was all these things and more. During what is known as its Catholic times, it was Merrie Olde England indeed.
Merrie Olde
England
Contrary to many historians' assertions, the period before the English 'Reformation' was not stagnant. In the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, the clergy and educated Catholics led a revival of letters and a return to the study of classical
Greece and Rome. The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge grew in international reputation. Under the patronage of the Church, Gothic art and architecture developed, replacing the plain, stodgy Norman style and the adornment of walls and interiors of countless churches were widely admired for their elaborate and ornate beauty. During this period, English music became renowned and its composers respected throughout Europe.
Work was available for any able-bodied man who desired it. Under the auspices of medieval guilds, merchants and tradesmen prospered, peasants were farming and gradually becoming small freeholders and artisans rose to the position of small contractors. Court intrigues, such as the War of the Roses, while fascinating to historians, were not a distraction for most people as they went about their daily business.
No more religious a people existed in Christendom. Men and women saw their churches as the centre, not only of their religious life, but their social existence also. A Venetian visitor commented, 'They all attend Mass everyday and say many Paternosters in public. The women carry long Rosaries in their hands and any who can read, take the Office of Our Lady with them and with some companion recite it in church verse by verse.' Christ's two Great Commandments, about loving God and neighbour (Matthew
22:36-40) shaped English society. As a Protestant economist put it, 'The essence of life in (Catholic England) was that everyone knew his neighbour and every one was his brother's keeper.'
This was, perhaps, the happiest society mankind has ever known.
The Catholic Church's Role

The Catholic Church's history of providing spiritual sustenance to the faithful is well known. What is less often recognised, is the Church's part in offering the basis for the temporal happiness of those recognising the Truth she proclaims. Yet this should not be surprising, as the Church's founder is Our Creator, Who knows us better than we know ourselves. It stands to reason then, that the rules He set down for relationships among mankind, best summarised in the 'Sermon on the Mount', whose amplification is known as the Church's Social Gospel, would best provide for social justice, stability and prosperity.
It is impossible to overstate the Catholic Church's role in Medieval England's happy state of affairs. For instance, two elements of the Church, the monastery system and clerical celibacy, contributed mightily to the elimination of poverty and provision for the needy and suffering.
The English Monastery System

From early times, the piety and charity exhibited by monks impressed the English and they became widely respected and admired. In due course, the royalty and nobility made their monasteries a means of providing generosity to the poor, founding monastic houses, erecting buildings and bequeathing endowments and estates.
Consequently, English monasteries became owners of great landed manors and huge tracts of land requiring tending. To support its ongoing operations and charity, monasteries rented land to tenant farmers, who raised cash crops and paid a tithe to the owners.
This system of tenancy farming was one of the foundations of the stable, prosperous English economy. A farmer would rent land from the monastery for long periods at low rents, paying one-tenth or so of the profits to his landlord. As title resided with the monastery, the farmer need not worry about the vagaries of ownership changes, with all the wrenching change that might bring. If the farmer fell on hard times, he found the monks to be easy landlords, often having rent forgiven or other arrangements made during times of distress.
Where did the landowner's profits go? Generally, after paying the costs of running the monastery, the remainder was provided for the indigent and needy within miles of the monastery.
Clerical Celibacy

Similarly, the Catholic parishes of the time were huge landowners and provided large areas for tenancy farming. Rent was collected and like the monasteries, the farmer who fell on hard times, found his parish priest to be a forgiving landlord.
What about the rent? By order of the English bishops, priests kept written accounts of what was paid to them and it was divided in the presence of specially appointed parishioners. The first part of the funds was for Church operation and repairs, the next portion reserved for the poor and disadvantaged and the last for the priest. Thus, the lion's share of rents paid, went either to the needy or for church upgrading.
Consequently, Catholic England established the most effective and efficient social safety net ever devised. The work of charity - feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, comforting the widowed and fatherless - came from land rents paid to the Church by the working farmer. Thus, resources for this work were provided, not from the occasional donations of the rich, but from the certain and steady source of the resident and unmarried parish priest, who, prompted by Christian charity, was responsible for both the spiritual and temporal well-being of his parishioners.
Here the Church's discipline of clerical celibacy was the key to
England's welfare economics. As an unmarried man, the priest had no family to support, no children or grandchildren to educate, no extended relations to entertain or subsidise. Thus, most profit derived from the land stayed in the local community in the form of hiring labour for Church repair or adornment, or as charity for the needy.
A notion of the size of the Catholic Church's landholdings is helpful. Somewhere between one third and one fifth of all
England was owned by monasteries and parishes, comprising millions of acres. This of course, made the Church a prime target for the plunderers who later seized the crown.
When Henry VIII (whose claim to the crown was illegitimate) began seizing monasteries in 1536, he attacked 376 of the lesser houses, turning out all the resident monks and dependents. This monstrous act marks the beginning of Merrie Olde
England's decline. In 1539, the king closed 202 larger monasteries, convents and priories. Later, Henry and his son Edward VI, confiscated the large endowments of universities, colleges, chantries (a chapel on private land), guilds and hospitals. In all, 645 monasteries, 90 colleges of priests, 110 hospitals, and 2,374 chantries, were abolished and their revenue pilfered. It was one of the largest larcenies ever committed by a government against its own people.
Consequently, thousands of tenant farmers were displaced and commonly, their lands fenced and made into pastures for the more profitable sheep industry. This vast dislocation caused the prosperous economy to fall into chaos and created a large class of wandering paupers.
England faced the spectre of massive poverty for the first time in history
The new Protestant government responded by outlawing penury in 1541. In all, twelve acts of Parliament were passed with the intent of dealing with this growing phenomenon and its attendant problems of crime and public health and morality. Compulsory taxation for the relief of the poor began and penalties for begging became harsher. Finally in 1547, the first year of Edward VI's reign, came the anti-begging act, nearly obscene in its cruelty. Beggars were punished by burning with a red hot iron and they became slaves for two years, with their masters able to force them to wear an iron collar and feed them with only bread and water.
Thus, Merrie
England became a hellish place for the poor, so ably described two hundred years later by Charles Dickens.
Architecture

Nothing in English architectural history is more remarkable than the church construction activity during the later half of the fifteenth and early part of the sixteenth centuries. From one end of the island to the other, church building and decoration, particularly in the English Gothic style, occurred in virtually every village. Much of this great architecture now lies in ruins, the result of the plundering of the monasteries, churches and abbeys. However, the difference between the earlier
Norman and later Gothic styles can be seen by contrasting the Tower of London with Salisbury Cathedral, Winchester Cathedral and Westminster Abbey.
Norman architecture blended the rugged Viking spirit with the Gallic Christian character. Thus, it tended to be blunt, massive and defensible. The
Tower of London is the archetypical example, with its large turrets guarding the square, compact main building. Inside, Saint John's Chapel, lying at its heart, is extremely stark, with thick, stubby columns and slit-like windows.
In contrast, the beautiful and ornate Gothic style of our period, reaches its apex in Salisbury Cathedral, Winchester Cathedral and Westminster Abbey, three of Christendom's most beautiful buildings.
Salisbury, one of the first major buildings in the new style, is a Gothic cathedral par excellence. Winchester Cathedral features a magnificent nave, the longest in Europe. The gorgeous Westminster Abbey is one of England's most recognisable buildings and still lends dignity to important royal and state functions, such as weddings, funerals and coronations.
James Bemis is an editorial board member and columnist for
California Political Review and a columnist for Catholic Exchange's 'The Edge'.

 

****************************************