The Benedictine Oblate
St.
Gregory's Chapter

Perth - Western Australia
Oblates affiliated to Holy Trinity Abbey, New Norcia
New Norcia web site - www.newnorcia.wa.edu.au

Period September - November 2007
MEETING PLACE
Chapter meetings are held at St. Joseph's Convent, 16 York Street, South Perth.
Meetings are held each 3rd. Sunday, commencing at 2.00pm sharp.
September - Chapter meeting to be held on Sunday, 16 September. Discussion on RB 64 & the Gospel of the day - Lk 15:1-32.
October - Chapter meeting to be held on Sunday, 21 October. Discussion on RB 65 & the Gospel of the day - Lk 18:1-8.
November - Chapter meeting to be held on Sunday, 18 November. Discussion on RB 66 & the Gospel of the day - Lk.21:5-19.
PRAYER LIST
Please remember all our sick oblates - in particular Pat Cockett & Michael Kent.
Prayers requested for Des Hoad and Mike McGovern's mother.
Please pray for the repose of the soul of Rhod's mother who passed away on 15 August. Our sympathy to Rhod and his family.
Also and always, continue to pray for our parent community in New Norcia.
Would you please remember all our deceased oblates.
ITEMS OF INTEREST
As usual, a good number of oblates were in attendance at the annual retreat held at New Norcia during the Trinity Sunday weekend period.
Fr. Anthony, our Spiritual Director, guided the oblates during his talks on three subjects: 'Thoughts of the body - Passions', 'Thoughts of the mind - Inner Blindness' and 'Anger'.
Fr. John spoke on 'Benedict in the World Today' - 1. The challenge of Today and 2. Prophetic statements in the Rule.
Fr. David spoke on Prayer and to guard against 'Acedia' (Slothfulness and Boredom).
To each of the above speakers, the oblates offer sincere thanks and appreciation for the time and effort taken by them to provide us with spiritual guidance as well as their assistance in making the retreat a memorable experience.
Our congratulations to Anne-Marie Mendis on being received as an oblate during her final oblation ceremony. Our thanks to Dom Chris who conducted the ceremony in the offertory and gave a homily in the presence of the monks and oblates of the Community. The oblates made their annual renewal of oblation at this time.
A large group (as usual) of oblates gathered together to celebrate St. Benedict's feast day on 11 July. The oblates celebrated Mass at the Redemptorist Monastery in North Perth and afterwards repaired to The Hyde Park Hotel for some refreshment together.
Following an invitation from the Anglican Oblates and also to celebrate St. Benedict's Feast Day, we received an invitation to attend Evensong at St. George's Anglican Cathedral on 15 July. Several oblates were in attendance and were able to hear Fr. John from New Norcia, the guest speaker, deliver a homily on Benedictine Oblation. We hope to get a copy of his address to insert in a future newsletter.
WHAT GETS BETTER WITH AGE AT NEW NORCIA?
Wine, Olive Oil & Dom Paulino! - taken, with thanks, from 'The Chimes' newsletter.
Dom Paulino Gutiérrez used to say that once he passed Fr Maur Enjuanes' record as the oldest ever monk of New Norcia, he was happy to 'go' when God decided. He passed that record in August last year when he reached the age of 96 years and 60 days.
However, not long after this, Dom Paulino realised that if he did die soon, the inscriptions on the crosses over his and Fr Maur's graves would only indicate that they were both 96-years-old. It would not be obvious to future cemetery observers that Dom Paulino was older. Suddenly, God had to wait - he decided he had to reach 97 so it would be clear to history that he held the record. As of 22 June, Dom Paulino showed he was again ready to accept the Lord's will - he turned 97!
Born in 1910 in a little northern Spanish village called Villaespasa, the main thing Dom Paulino remembers about his childhood, is how he and the boys of the village spent much of their time playing games. His family had a small farm with wheat for making bread, a few sheep and some cattle for ploughing - just enough to 'keep the family alive'. All 50 families in the village were poor, but Dom Paulino says everyone was very happy: 'You didn't know you were poor. You thought you had just enough for yourselves'.
At the age of 14, Dom Paulino was at a Sunday Mass in his village with his grandmother and the celebrant was a Benedictine monk who asked the young men to consider joining the monastery. Dom Paulino told his grandmother that he was interested. After Mass, his grandmother spoke to the monk, who told Dom Paulino to be at the train station next Saturday. His monastic journey had begun!
Dom Paulino first went to the Spanish monastery at El Pueyo, but after about six months there, he was sent to the monastery at Valvanera, Spain, where he spent his novitiate and was professed. The young monks had been asked if they were willing to go to the Philippines or Australia to work. When Abbot Catalan of New Norcia had visited Dom Paulino's monastery, he had shown him photographs of Australian Aborigines in traditional dress: 'Big men with big spears', Dom Paulino recalls. This prompted Dom Paulino to choose to come to the Australian mission.
However, believing the photographs were of New Norcia, when in fact they were taken at the mission in Kalumbaru, Dom Paulino arrived at New Norcia in 1928 to find - to his great surprise - the Aborigines dressed like everyone else and not a spear in sight!
After nearly seventy-nine years at New Norcia, Dom Paulino may be a little slower these days, but he still keeps himself busy. 'I'll have plenty of time to rest in the cemetery,' he was once heard to say.
Asked for advice on how to live a long life, New Norcia's miller and baker of 50 years and olive oil maker for 20 years, replied - 'Bread and olive oil!' Good genes, however, might also have something to do with it.
Dom Paulino's father lived until he was 96, his mother until she was 88, his sister reached 90 years and his three brothers, with ages ranging from 75 to 90, are still going strong in Spain. Dom Paulino mischievously recounts the story how, about eight years ago, the monks were to be measured up for new habits. Dom Paulino, then approaching 90, said not to worry about getting one made for him, he wouldn't be around too long to wear it. He is still wearing that same old habit!
Regular visitors to New Norcia have often been farewelled by Dom Paulino with the words, 'See you in heaven', but many have heard it so many times now, they wonder which of them will make it there first.
The Benedictine Community and the townspeople of New Norcia take great pleasure in congratulating Dom Paulino on his 97th birthday, in thanking him for his cheerful presence among us and in wishing him the very best of health and happiness for the future.
INTIMACY - WITH GOD, OTHERS AND OUR 'TRUE' SELVES
An article on Lectio by Brendan Moss OSB
Lectio Divina involves relationships. In lectio we have the opportunity to encounter God, other people and our 'true' selves. In the Scriptures we meet God. We hear God's Word and enter into conversation with the divine. Through our meditation and contemplation, we seek to know God's heart, God's will for us. We also share our concerns, our fears, our joys, etc. Lectio helps us 'grow in the love of God' as we grow in any intimate love relationship - through a continuum of knowing, trusting, desiring, surrendering our defences and fears and ultimately our very selves, to the Beloved. Lectio, in the life of a Benedictine, becomes the place of rendezvous for the monk/oblate and God. Through lectio, the two lovers meet and rest in the arms of each other, striving to become one. We experience the tender compassion of our God.
Lectio, however, does not limit our intimacy to God alone. Holy reading opens us to intimacy with others. The Scriptures are filled with friends of God, whom God wishes us to meet. Lectio invites us to come to know Mary, Martha, Paul, James, Peter, Ruth and so many others. We can meet the saints within the text and the saints who wrote them.
Lectio also assists us in coming to know our 'true' selves. Thomas Merton, the famous monk and author, often wrote of the 'false' and 'true' self. The false self is what we present to the world. It is the façade of what we believe about our material success and well-being. It is the image we want to project to others. The 'true' self however, is the reality of our person. It is our soul as God sees it. It includes our talents, gifts, sins and weaknesses. The 'true' self is how we appear when God looks upon us. In the depths of the lectio experience God reveals to us our 'true' selves. He shows us the truth about our hearts and spirits.
In lectio, 'we not only get to know the love and the Lover more, we get to know ourselves more as we come to see ourselves, as it were, in the eyes of the Beloved'. In lectio, God speaks a personal word to us. During our holy reading we are invited to stand naked before God, bearing our whole self to the Lord. This means the practice of lectio can help us face our sinful nature. It calls us to see the truth that we are creatures dependent upon our Creator. Our dependence on God is part of the beauty of our relationship with the Lord. We need God. Our nature yearns for God. We want to be one with Him. As lectio draws us closer to God, we also grow closer to our 'true' selves and see ourselves with divine eyes.
Conversatio - Conversion As we come to know our 'true' selves in lectio, we become more aware of our fallen nature. We are in touch with our weaknesses and flaws. We recognize our need to continually set our hearts on the Lord, that we may receive God's Word. We understand that we are sinners who frequently fall from God's grace and need to return to that grace. Conversatio is the 'vow to respond totally and integrally to the word of Christ.' 'Conversatio is essentially the vow to do metanoia (repenting), the turning away from self-will and the turning toward God's will.' Lectio Divina is a vehicle through which monks/oblates do that very thing. In lectio, Benedictines set their eyes on God. Benedictines read, reflect and rest with God's Word. By opening the scriptures day-in and day-out, the monks/oblates open themselves up to its transforming power. Lectio helps them get up over and over again when they have fallen into sin. We go each day into the 'holy of holies' of lectio to reconcile ourselves with God. The act of holy reading forms the monastic heart in the practice of conversatio. We become disciples aware of our utter dependence on God. Growth in the habit of lectio causes us to grow in our desire for God. The increased desire we experience then moves us to seek the Lord more and more. Our lectio then expands to the world around us, insofar as we begin listening for a word from God throughout our day-to-day experiences. A scene from nature, an article in a magazine, the phrase we hear on the radio or see on a billboard, can become the source of our next divine encounter. We become people that seek God in all things. Ultimately the goal of lectio is to open the Benedictine's heart and soul in such a way that the disciple can absorb the Word of God into the rhythm of his/her life. The fruits of lectio, especially rootedness in God's Word, intimacy with God, others, our 'true' selves and conversatio, help us to make the Benedictine way of life our own. These fruits unite us with those who have been nourished for fifteen hundred years in this 'school of the Lord's service.' Through lectio, the heart of a monk/oblate learns to beat with God's Word. It is formed by holy reading that then defines who we are. Let us then as monks/oblates renew our commitment to this sacred prayer and 'run on the path of God's commandments, our hearts overflowing with the inexpressible delight of love.'
MORALITY OF ACTS AND MORALITY OF GOALS
By Anselm Pedrizetti OSB - taken from 'The Oblate' newsletter of St. John's Abbey.
Many Catholics find it rather difficult to go to confession. To the extent that this is the case, it is worthwhile to examine the attitudes we bring to the confessional, for we are obviously concerned here with a crucial aspect of Christian life and an aversion for the experience necessary to make contact with the saving act of Christ in the Sacrament of Penance. This can lead one down various lonely roads, towards an isolation without any real security, meaning, or hope.
The Old Law
The phrase 'to go to confession' is itself an indication of the kind of emphasis we can give to an act that is essentially a joyful liturgical celebration. It gives prominence to the process we must undergo in order to make a 'good' confession. It conjures up the painful work of examining one's conscience, of producing the most perfect act of contrition at one's disposal, of actually confessing one's sins with proper regard for the distinctions of venial and mortal, essential and unessential modifying circumstances and finally it reminds us of the resolution which we have been avoiding all month, to change our ways and the need to perform the penance given. While all of these things are necessary and worthwhile, they can if considered apart from the action of Christ who we meet in the Sacrament, lead us into an attitude that has been described as a 'morality of acts.'
This means that our entire moral life is built around the formidable list of sins in the typical examination booklet. Such an approach is basically negative, for it elicits - if it has any effect at all - a concentrated effort to avoid an enormous array of activities, any one of which is viewed as plunging one into the depths of hell. It is most pitiful to see a person who is struggling valiantly to lead an upright Christian life, slip into a consuming depression over the experience of a slip of the tongue, a momentary flash of anger, or some other single indulgence in selfishness, which is quickly regretted, but looked upon as involving a complete condemnation and rejection by God.
A morality of acts keeps us preoccupied with the minutiae of the commandments, engenders a complete mistrust of emotions - for they become little more than possible vehicles of sin - forces a strained alertness towards the complicated details of moral obligation and tends to make us see danger lurking ominously around every corner. One is very hard put to face up to such a situation and the appalling thing is, that success in such an endeavour makes one a Pharisee, proud of the accomplishment, better than the rest of men, fully confident of pleasure given to God and a reward which becomes a quasi-juridical right.
The New Law
But this is not Christian life. The law of the New Dispensation revealed through Christ is a call to perfection that is first of all Christ Himself incarnated in our world, the eternal and infinite Sacrifice given to the Father. In His glorified form it is communicated to us through the Sacraments of the Church. The glory of God is the splendour of His holiness and love, a glory which embodies the redemptive sacrifice of Christ in enduring and permanent form and a glory which calls us to participate in the divine redemptive perfection which is Christ and which He freely and lovingly offers us. The appearance of God on Mount Thabor and the Transfiguration of Christ are biblical indications we have, of the glory Christ wishes to share with us.
Our faith tells us we have already received the beginnings of this glory in Baptism. There Christ has been given to us, together with the supernatural virtues and graces which form in us what St. Paul calls a new creature. The grace we have received is not merely a means of avoiding sin, but rather the bond that ties us to God, a manifestation of the glory of God and a power urging us to face God, to see, through faith, the work of His redemption within us and to adore God in all things. It is the dynamic beginning of our own participation in glory and it provides us with a firm foundation for our hope in the resurrection of the body and our eventual assumption into the immediate experience of God's glory.
This is the message of the New Testament and unless morality in its practical aspects is tied to this message, it is bound to go astray. Separated from the Gospel it becomes powerless to effect what it demands. It stultifies, inhibits and discourages. Joined to Christ and the power of His redeeming love, it gives life, incentive, inspiration and most of all, it gives direction to our lives. In the Sacrament of Penance, it lays emphasis on the absolution, the most important act in the confessional, for it is the act of Christ communicating His redemption to us and renewing the energies we are asked to direct towards the full development and manifestation of the glory of God within us and the world.
The Challenge of Christianity
Here we have a 'morality of goals.' Christian life is not a collection of isolated acts, but a continuous growth and development towards the goal set before us by God. In this light, the moral problem we have is not so much to struggle against the inroads of temptations to specific sins, but to render these temptations ineffectual. We do this by organising all the forces at our disposal, joining them to the power of Christ at work within us and directing them towards the goal appointed to us by God. This is actually a more difficult task than avoiding sins. We can be the most honest and just businessmen in town, for the sake perhaps of public relations and expediency, but such an attitude does not necessarily involve the total dedication of our lives and persons to the law of Christ which is demanded by a 'morality of goals.' If we appear at Mass each Sunday and eat fish on Friday, we are keeping a minimum. But the morality indicated by Christ suggests that it is our obligation to take stock of the talents given to us and make use of all of them for the glory of God and the spread of His kingdom. Christ dares us to offer ourselves without reservation to Him and to His work.
The difficulty involved here however, is not as likely to discourage us as the hovering burden of an impersonal sea of moral prescriptions, for our dedication to God gives us the confidence we need. We can depend upon the power of God within us and its effectiveness in proportion as we accept and cooperate with it. With the goal given to us by the Gospel in mind, the incentive to keep trying is certainly enhanced, for our ultimate objective is not merely to be freed from sin and its wages, but to strip away the mirror of faith and find God as He is in Himself. This kind of project makes our toil eminently more meaningful.
BASIL THE GREAT
By Hugh Feiss OSB
Basil, like his brothers Gregory and Naucratius, received a traditional classical education which prepared them for public life. When Basil was about 16, after his father's death, he went to Caesarea in Cappadocia to study and two years later to Constantinople. In 349 or 350 he went to study at Athens and remained there for five years. In Athens he became close friends with Gregory of Nazianzus, who also became an important theologian.
St. Basil returned home from his studies in 355. Gregory of Nyssa (his brother) tells us that Macrina (his sister) needed to bring him down a peg or two. Within a year he was baptised and before long became a monastic organiser and ecclesiastical leader. For some months he travelled around monasteries in the Eastern Mediterranean. One of his goals was to make contact with Eustathius, a leader in the ascetic movement in Asia Minor, with whom his family had been in contact and who was a bishop, theologian and monastic leader. Basil later broke with him over both theological issues and monastic theory and practice.
Eustathius was born in Armenia c. 300. His asceticism led to a quarrel with his father (who may have been a bishop of Sebaste). Eustathius left Sebaste and tried unsuccessfully to join the clergy of Antioch. In the 330s he entered the clergy of Caesarea in Cappadocia. He was condemned at Synods in Neocaesarea and Garbra. He left no writings, but judging from the condemnations, he was associated with those who advocated a highly ascetical form of Christianity, which devalued family life and was disdainful of ordinary Church structures. On the other hand, Eustathius was a champion of monastic life and encouraged monastic communities to operate hospices for the needy.
From 357-359, Basil and Gregory of Nazianzus studied in their retreat at Annisa. They followed set written rules of life. Their life included regular prayer, reading, silence, simple dress, humble demeanour, limited sleep and food. The goal was emotional control and tranquillity. They read the bible and compiled a selection of texts from Origen's writings (the Philokalia). After Gregory departed from Annisa, Basil attended the Synod of Constantinople toward the end of 359. He was appointed a Reader in the church, then returned to Annisa. In 362, Gregory returned to Annisa, after having been ordained a priest. Basil himself was ordained before the year was out and became active in the church of Caesarea for a few months. Basil was again at Annisa in 363. In 365 Basil returned once more to Caesarea, and five years later he was ordained bishop of the city.
Beginning at Annisa, Basil gathered together a series of questions and answers of Christian life, which is known as the Small Asceticon. He is also responsible for a Great Asceticon, which contains some parts of the Small Asceticon, along with much other material. Both works are in question and answer form and they seem to have originated in actual question and answer sessions between Basil and other Christians. Although these works are often termed rules, they are not monastic rules after the fashion of the Rule of Benedict or the Rule of Augustine. They have more affinity with the question-and-answers in the Sayings of the Desert Fathers. However, Basil's questions and answers, though many reflect a monastic setting, deal with matters of interest to Christians who are not monks.
Basil speaks of a life of eusebeia (piety), that is, a life lived according to the way of God and so a life well pleasing to God (euaristesis). This is a life of effort (askesis), but effort in community (synaskesis). Those who seek to please God keep the commandments, do God's will, live strictly and keep a single aim (skopos) in mind - the glory of God. Such a life is rooted in the Bible. The first 'rule' in Basil's collection of questions and answers is that the greatest commandment is the twofold commandment of all. For Basil, love is the norm for each day of the Christian's life, not simply the goal (as it seems to have been for Evagrius). In this first rule, Basil united separation from the world, to love God with love of neighbour in community. His spirituality and his monastic ideal were always communal and he encouraged monastic and other communities to offer hospitality and other forms of charity. The second 'rule' discusses how God has implanted a desire in each person, a love or desire for the Good, which is God. Basil attempts to inflame such love, by insisting on how much God has done for us. God has also made us social beings, hence the biblical command to love one another which is illustrated in the lives of holy people. The key to fulfilling the commandment of love, is never to forget God, to live always in His presence. This requires a mental and often a physical separation from the crowd, in imitation of Christ, though not from community.
Gregory of Nyssa
Gregory of Nyssa was well educated, married and though he was a Reader, beginning about 364 he pursued a secular career. When he was about 40, in 372, Basil convinced him to become bishop of Nyssa. When Basil died in 379, Gregory became a champion of Basil's theology and ecclesiastical policies. Gregory was a man of wide interests who wrote on many different theological subjects. He does not seem to have been a monk. For our purposes, most important are those works of his which supplied theoretical foundations for the monastic movement championed by his brother. Most of these works come from the latter part of his life. He emphasised the infinitude and incomprehensibility of God. Christian life is an unceasing striving or ascent of the soul to union with God. He interpreted the Song of Songs as a celebration of the union of love between God and the human soul. His Life of Moses encouraged withdrawal from human affairs to seek God, the need for asceticism and contemplative striving toward God and the need to return from contemplation to offer service to others.
Conclusion
St. Benedict's Rule concludes with references to St. Basil (73.5). Basil certainly had enormous influence on later monasticism, especially in the Eastern Church. Basil and Macrina lived at a time when the lines between lay Christians, ascetics and monks were blurred. Macrina seems to have gone from fiancée to widow, from family ascetic to organised community life, in what was probably a double monastery. Basil, like another of his brothers, Peter, went from hermit to bishop, but he was clearly very interested in many forms of ascetic and monastic life. Naucratius died as a hermit. His brother, Gregory of Nyssa was married and perhaps never was a monk, but he wrote on asceticism and contemplation. Basil, Macrina and their siblings lived at a time when there were many options open for Christians and the definitions of various vocations were still quite fluid.
Basil's ministry and writings, inspired and supported by his sister Macrina, built upon the work of Eustathius, even while diverging from it, to promote communal (cenobitic) forms of celibate Christian communities - to keep monasticism firmly rooted in the life of the church and to encourage such communities to offer organised hospitality towards the needy. This threefold legacy was a great gift to St. Benedict and those who follow the Rule of Benedict.
THE TRUE FACE OF MARTYRDOM
Article from 'The Tablet' by Brian Wicker - Aug 2006
Dying for one's faith, previously associated with acts of courage, is now tainted in the public mind by the claims of suicide bombers to be martyrs for Islam. How did such perverted thinking emerge and can martyrdom be reclaimed as an honourable act?
The arrest of terrorist suspects in Britain, raised the prospect once more, that British-born Muslims were prepared to die, as they saw it, in the name of Islam. Security services and the police said they had unearthed alleged plots for suicide bombers to blow up planes as they crossed the Atlantic. These conspiracies were being put together just a year after a group of Muslim men killed themselves and nearly 50 other people in London through bombs planted in underground trains and on a bus.
To the majority of people, these acts will be seen as barbarous, taking the lives of innocent people. To some though, they will be seen as acts of martyrdom. Martyrdom has a long tradition in both Islam and Christianity, for the shedding of one's blood for the sake of one's beliefs has an emotive pull as well as a religious one. Within the early Christian Church, martyrs were perceived as heroic witnesses to the truth in which they believed, with shrines and churches built in their honour.
But surely no sane person wants to be a martyr, any more than he or she wants to be crucified. Of course, the best of us want to witness to the truth (which is what being a martyr really means) and a few are prepared to do this even at the cost of being killed. The world being what it is, it is quite likely that anyone who is truly prepared to be such a witness will in fact be killed. But being a witness and being killed are different things.
Part of the problem is the greed for glory. While none of us want to be killed for our beliefs, quite a lot of us in anticipation, would relish the posthumous veneration which those who have died for the faith commonly attract. Perhaps we imagine that we will enjoy becoming part of the 'cult' of martyrdom. I suppose it is even possible that some twisted individuals would invite death for the sake of being venerated for it afterwards. Nevertheless, surely nobody can actually want to be killed in order to get this 'glory'? Yet wanting it seems to be at the root of the 'martyrdom operations', such as suicide bombing, which has scarred New York, Israel and Britain, among others, in recent years.
It is at this point, I think, that Islamic 'martyrdom operations' differ most radically from Christian examples. Indeed, the term 'operations' gives the game away, for it suggests that being killed for the faith, that is being martyred, is something you choose to do, not something that happens to you, whereas Christian martyrdom is a gift from God - the gift of being able to witness, come what may. Modern Islamic martyrdoms, on the contrary, seem to be based on actions that people choose to carry out, presumably to prove - to themselves and to their communities, perhaps to God - that they are prepared to die for what they believe in. At this point, the witness stops being a martyr and becomes a criminal.
It was not always so. Indeed the two traditions earliest theologies of martyrdom, or witnessing to the faith, are very similar. In both, even against persecution, 'witnessing' was essentially a non-violent response.
In Arabic, the word commonly translated as 'martyr' (shahid), in the sense of someone willing to be killed for the faith, does not occur in the Qur'an at all. It is used there only for a witness in the legal, or eyewitness sense. It was only in the post-Qur'anic period, following fierce persecution by the pagans of Medina, that the word became specialised to indicate someone who had been killed in fighting for the faith. The Qur'an itself is a much more complex work than it is commonly thought to be, especially by those who wish to justify modern 'martyrdom operations'.
The development of the Islamic meaning of shahid is paralleled by the development of 'martyrdom' in Christianity. In fact, some scholars suspect that there was a Christian influence on the Islamic development of the term, through contacts between the Muslims and the Christians of the Levant. But a key difference in Islam is that pagan persecution of the small tightly knit faith community in Arabia became very violent within the Prophet's own lifetime - almost as soon as he had moved his sphere of activity from Mecca to Medina. A result was, that the pressure for the Muslims to defend themselves by force rapidly became overwhelming. Hence the association of witnessing to the faith and fighting in defence of it was established quickly and soon became almost the norm, despite the early Qur'anic verses that discouraged it.
This process was later helped by the use of the concept of 'abrogation' (naskh) in the scholarly interpretation of the Qur'an itself. In this, verses held to have been revealed to the Prophet in later life were said to have 'abrogated' the earlier (predominantly non-violent) messages of the Meccan period. Modern scholars have challenged the misuse of naskh, which lends itself to the justification of a 'military' concept of the role of the faithful Muslim, or 'martyr', against that of the Muslim who is a non-violent witness. But they have an uphill struggle against the now widespread, albeit mistaken notion, that Islam was rooted in violence from the start.
For Christians, the story was different. Very early on, they were scattered in many parts of the Roman Empire, as preaching the Gospel quickly spread from Jerusalem. Furthermore, the Christians were virtually debarred from serving in the Roman army because of its dedication to polytheism (whereas the Roman army had virtually no relevance to the seventh-century Muslims of Arabia). Hence there were very few Christian soldiers before the beginning of the third century AD. This explains why the association of martyrdom with military operations, even in 'self-defence' of the faith, failed to develop as it has in Islam. This helped establish a strong tradition that maintains that martyrdom, or witnessing to the faith, is incompatible with service in the military, even in a 'just war'. True, Pope John VIII (872-882) seems to have thought that a person dying in a 'just war' could be regarded as a martyr, but his view failed to take hold.
Aquinas, in his treatment of martyrdom, takes it for granted that martyrdom is incompatible with participation in warfare, with only one exception - members of the chivalric military orders in the Crusades could become martyrs, because they were fighting in God's service, rather than that of a mere king. This concession could have become a loophole through which much damaging ideology might have been driven. Perhaps the demise of crusading prevented such a disaster.
The early teachings of both traditions on suicide are very close - suicide is clearly forbidden. But on both sides, theological difficulties soon arose and very often the answers given seem weak. Thus, the Christian virgin St Pelagia of Antioch (died c. 311) clearly killed herself to avoid being raped and is yet accounted a virgin martyr. Both Augustine and Aquinas can only offer the lame excuse that the Church 'by manifestations worthy of credence' decided to honour her. They have even more trouble in justifying the suicide of Samson and can only say that his self-killing was sanctioned by the Holy Spirit.
Parallel problems arise for some Islamic theorists, such as Ayman al-Zawahiri, in justifying suicidal operations today. Provided these are done for the greater good, he has argued, the Qur'anic prohibitions can be set aside. Or it is sometimes maintained, that suicides are not really suicidal because they are such heroic deeds. They are not done out of hopelessness or despair but out of a desire to 'cast terror and fear into the hearts of the oppressors' (Al-Qaradawi). Both sets of answers seem to be notably weak, even irrational. They tend to muddle the actions which the 'martyrs' do with their motives for doing them. Either way, the prohibition on suicide is weakened. Thus the suicidal operations of today are provided with a sort of theological justification.
More interesting perhaps, is the thought that in the future we may need to acknowledge a new kind of martyr - one that both traditions could accept. I am thinking of martyrs 'for justice and peace'. I borrow this phrase from Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor's public praise of Margaret Hassan, who was murdered for helping the ordinary citizens of Iraq during a lifetime spent as a Western Catholic married to a Muslim and who held Iraqi nationality and consistently opposed the Western invasion of her country. She is perhaps only the latest candidate, following examples like those of Edith Stein, Franz Jägerstätter, Maximilian Kolbe and Dorothy Stang. For all of these died as witnesses, not to Christianity as such, but to justice and peace within the global community.
One way in which the West could help to rebalance the distorted notions of martyrdom that have become prevalent today, would be to acknowledge publicly that these witnesses (and doubtless many others, of both faiths) are martyrs for everybody - that is witnesses who can be venerated by Muslims as well as Christians, because what they died for was something recognisably good for all.
Brian Wicker, as chairman of the Council on Christian Approaches to Defence and Disarmament (CCADD), is the editor of 'Witnesses to Faith? martyrdom in Christianity and Islam', recently published by Ashgate. CCADD may be contacted on CCADD@lineone.net.
                                                                               

 

 

                                                                        ************************